Personal and Professional Enhancement Program (PPEP)

Personal and Professional Enhancement Program (PPEP)

Background:
With the aim to enhance the senior nursing managers to be caring leaders so that they can nurture their team members to be holistic care providers, a one year program has been developed with emphasis on self-reflection and self-cultivation.
Purpose:
It aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a one-year leadership enhancement program in an acute general hospital.
Design & Methods:
Both quantitative and qualitative approaches were adopted. A pre and post questionnaire survey and the content analysis of self-reflective essays were conducted.
Results:
The overall means of the servant leadership scale and the workplace wellness scale were significantly higher after the program. Both scales were also found to have a significantly medium level of positive correlation. Reflective essays showed positive feedbacks complementing the quantitative data that the program was well received and effective.
Conclusion:
A servant leadership approach may be one way for hospital management to enhance a caring environment and a more quality workforce.

Rank: 94
First Author: Luk
Outcome: Work-Life Balance,Intervention Experience,Well-being,Job Satisfaction,Social Support,Respect
Outcome p-value: Work-Life Balance:●, Intervention Experience:●, Well-being:⭑⭑⭑, Job Satisfaction:⭑⭑, Social Support:⭑⭑, Respect:⭑⭑
Intervention Category: Reflection and Relaxation,Peer Support
Time per Employee (hours): 21
Hours per Employee: 21
D&B Study Quality Rating: 12
Reviewer Confidence: 1.5
Country: China
Study Design Type: Mixed Methods
Materials Available to Implement: Intervention outlined in publication. Corresponding author: aluk@nethersole.org.hk.
Organiz./Individ. Focus: Organizational
Prevention Category: Primary,Secondary
Effect size Small:
Effect size Medium:
Reference: Luk, L. A. (2018). Assessment of a Leadership Enhancement Program for Nursing Managers of An Acute General Hospital in Hong Kong. The Open Nursing Journal, 12(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601812010133