Micro-Task Intervention

Micro-Task Intervention

Although burnout, poor quality of life (QOL), depression, and other forms of psychological distress are common among physicians, few studies testing interventions to reduce distress have been reported. We conducted a randomized trial to determine the impact of a 10-week, individualized, online intervention on well-being among physicians (n=290). Participants were randomized to either the intervention or control arm. Those in the intervention arm received a menu of self-directed micro-tasks once a week for 10 weeks, and were asked to select and complete one task weekly. Baseline and end-of-study questionnaires evaluating well-being (i.e., burnout, depression, QOL, fatigue) and professional satisfaction (i.e., job satisfaction, work engagement, meaning in work, and satisfaction with work-life balance) were administered to both arms. Overall quality of life and fatigue improved over the 10 weeks of the study for those in the intervention arm (both p < 0.01). When compared to the control arm, however, no statistically significant improvement in these dimensions of well-being was observed. At the completion of the study, those in the intervention arm were more likely to report participating in the study was worthwhile compared to those in the control arm. The findings suggest that although participants found the micro-tasks in the intervention arm worthwhile, they did not result in measurable improvements in well-being or professional satisfaction when compared to the control group. These results also highlight the critical importance of an appropriate control group in studies evaluating interventions to address physician burnout and distress.

Rank: 28
First Author: Dyrbye
Outcome: Emot. Exhaust./Comp. Fatig.,Depression,Burnout,Work-Life Balance,Job Satisfaction
Outcome p-value: Emotional Exhaustion/Compassion Fatigue●, Depression:●, Burnout:●, Work-Life Balance:●, Job Satisfaction:●
Intervention Category: Coping Skills Development,Mindfulness,Reflection and Relaxation
Time per Employee (hours): No time specified.
D&B Study Quality Rating: 18.5
Reviewer Confidence: 3.5
Country: US
Study Design Type: RCT
Materials Available to Implement: Intervention described in publication. Corresponding author: dyrbye.liselotte@mayo.edu.
Organiz./Individ. Focus: Individual
Prevention Category: Primary,Secondary
Effect size Small:
Effect size Medium:
Reference: Dyrbye, Liselotte N., Colin P. West, Melanie L. Richards, Helen J. Ross, Daniel Satele, and Tait D. Shanafelt. “A Randomized, Controlled Study of an Online Intervention to Promote Job Satisfaction and Well-Being among Physicians.” Burnout Research 3, no. 3 (September 2016): 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2016.06.002.